Andhra Pradesh: Teachers’ federation considering legal challenge against attendance app

0

We are in talks with other unions and legal experts to thwart attempt to impose new system on fraternity, say APTF leaders

We are in talks with other unions and legal experts to thwart attempt to impose new system on fraternity, say APTF leaders

On Friday, leaders of the Andhra Pradesh Teachers’ Federation (APTF) said they would wage a legal battle to stop the implementation of the facial recognition app for attendance registration by teachers in the State.

In a statement, Federation President Ch. Manjula and General Secretary K. Bhanu Murthy said they were in talks with other teachers’ unions for support and also with legal experts “to thwart the attempts to impose the new attendance system on the teaching fraternity”.

Thursday’s talks between representatives of various teachers’ unions and Education Minister Botcha Satyanarayana remained inconclusive, with the minister clarifying that use of the app was mandatory for teachers.

Opposing the government’s decision, APTF leaders said they had made it clear that they would not use their personal cell phones to upload their attendance information and that the government should provide them with devices.

They said the minister had assured teachers that they would be given a 15-day grace period to get used to the new system and that in the meantime officials would sort out technical issues, if any.

“But contrary to his assurance, officials are now saying there is no grace period and teachers will have to switch to the new attendance system with immediate effect,” they said.

Referring to the issue of 80% vacant Mandal education officer and deputy district education officer positions in the state, they said it was because the issue of common service rules was pending in court.

“Instead of resolving the case in court, the government is trying to fill the vacancies with public school principals,” they said, adding that the federation opposed the move, which violated the order. of the Supreme Court.

In addition, instead of filling the positions permanently, the government had asked school principals to take on all the additional costs as MOEs.

Referring to the government’s claim that it would sanction an additional 660 MEO posts, they demanded that the posts be filled by candidates from the common list.


Source link

Share.

Comments are closed.